If another "read it later" app happens to offer highlighting (most don't), the feature is almost always an afterthought. Second, Instapaper features a remarkably clean, uncluttered reading experience on both desktop and mobile complete with - drumroll please - highlighting! Not just that: Instapaper treats highlighting and note-taking as first-class features. For the reasons below, Instapaper is still our read it later app of choice.
#Instapaper api for free
It was then announced that, after years of being offered for free under the aegis of Pinterest, Instapaper was reinstating Instapaper Premium for $2.99/month or $29.99/year. Sidebar: Ironically, shortly after writing this article, it was announced that Instapaper is going independent. For many of us, Google Reader is a cautionary tale of how free reading apps can disappear at any time. We must, however, explain why we so strongly endorse Instapaper over the many worthy competitors out there.įirst, under the aegis of Pinterest, Instapaper is offered completely, 100% free, including its wonderful mobile app. Originally released more than a decade ago by the prolific developer, Marco Arment, Instapaper requires no introduction among our audience. In other words, time is a potent filter.īut which of the many "read it later" apps should you use? We heartily recommend Instapaper. This is because disposable clickbait quickly loses its appeal while high-quality content tends to maintain its luster. More importantly, and more subtly, read it later apps naturally filter out low-quality articles.
The simple practice of deferring the decision to read satisfies the immediate desire to snack. These apps enable you to send articles to a central depository where you can choose to deliberately read them later rather than impulsively reading them on the spot. One killer technique is to use a "read it later" app such as Instapaper, Pocket, Refind, et al.
So how can you stop reading junk articles and start reading higher quality content? But cumulatively, over time, consistent snacking leads to undesired effects. Reading a clickbaity article here or there probably won't corrupt your mind, just like a handful of M&Ms now and again probably won't cause diabetes. Thinly veiled "content marketing" that touches on maybe one useful insight before arriving at the self-interested call-to-action. Medium posts about self-actualization consumed exclusively by Medium writers who post about self-actualization ( Stop Trying to Find Yourself Create Yourself Instead) or, Unfortunately, the same can now be said for articles on the internet, with most web content falling into one of the following buckets:Ĭomplete nonsense disguised by a clickbaity headline and an irresistible cover photo ( Man Tries to Hug a Wild Lion, You Won't Believe What Happens Next!) There are such things as healthy snacks, but as we all know, they're typically junk food by design - mass-produced, dopamine-inducing, heavily-marketed quick fixes. To continue this analogy, if books are meals, then articles are snacks. In the same way that you want to nourish your body with only high-quality, nutritious foods, you also want to feed your mind with only high-quality, thoughtful content. It turns out, the same is true for reading: You are what you read.
When it comes to eating healthily, we've all heard the saying: You are what you eat.
0 kommentar(er)
